Pedagogies for
Contemporary
Media + Fiction

Jentery Sayers | @jenterysayers | jentery@uvic.ca
Praxis Studio for Comparative Media Studies
Dept. of English | University of Victoria

Hartwick College
English Department | 22 April 2021

These slides are available online at jentery.github.io/hartwick.

Use your left + right arrow keys or space bar to navigate this deck. Or swipe.

Image care of Danielle Morgan.

Acknowledgments

I acknowledge and respect the lək̓ʷəŋən peoples on whose traditional
territory the University of Victoria stands and the Songhees, Esquimalt, and W̱SÁNEĆ peoples, whose historical relationships with the land continue to this day. I teach and conduct my research as a grateful, uninvited guest on these lands.

Office of Indigenous Academic & Community Engagement at UVic

Acknowledgments

I would also like to thank Susan Navarette and everyone at Hartwick for making this event happen, as well as Faith Ryan, Samuel Adesubokan, Tracey El Hajj, Julie M. Funk, Stefan Higgins, Hector Lopez, Danielle Morgan, Alana Sayers, and Lexy Townsend, each of whom has contributed
to the work I am presenting today.

Today

Something like a tour of media + fiction pedagogies at UVic

Touching on stress points across a decade of teaching here

Changes I have made to my teaching, why + to what effects

But really, the story of an OA textbook (ack!) + how it got that way

Image and cover of Contemporary Media and Fiction care of Danielle Morgan.

About Me

I edited three books (1, 2, and 3).

I've been trying to write one, too.

I direct the Praxis Studio (fka MLab).

I've taught in four UVic programs: English,
Digital Humanities (RIP), Technology and Society,
and Cultural, Social, and Political Thought.

Image care of Danielle Morgan.

My Pedagogy

I tend to concentrate on . . .

How this becomes that (see Fuller; Rosner; Sterne; "Transduction"),

Learning in medias res, or making rough cuts (see Barad; Kraus),

Critics as producers (see W. Benjamin; Kairos journal), and

Expanding what "writing" means (see Shipka).

Image care of Danielle Morgan.

Five Things Pedagogical
for the Next 30 Minutes

Technology
Content
Frameworks
Engagement
Access

For each of these, I will address three "periods" or pedagogies I have tried at UVic.
They are not progressions from "worst" to "best," but rather iterations with distinct positions on
the more general question of media's role in humanities pedagogy.
Most of it boils down to what works best in the context I am in.
Image care of Danielle Morgan.

What's learned over time
from classroom experiments with media?

How is that learning a part
of humanities research?

About "experiments": I mean "critical media practice." I do not work much with tools or data
(in any strict, quantitative sense), and the Praxis Studio does not oversee any digitization projects.
I lean, then, toward media studies, with an awareness of humanities computing.
For more on HC, see the HCMC and OCAM at UVic.
Image care of Danielle Morgan.

1. Technology

2009-14: "Toychest" approach, where students sample
a variety of tools and gadgets
(syllabus for "Digital Literary Studies";
"Multimodal Communications"; see Liu)

2015-20: Software-agnostic techniques, where students learn
fundamentals as an expanded form of writing
(syllabus for "Arguing with Computers"; see Gil and Parrish)

Recently: Interests-forward, where students learn
core concepts but choose an angle on a
spectrum of low- to high-tech
(syllabus for "Contemporary Media and Fiction";
see Mitchell)

Image care of Danielle Morgan.

Tech + Pedagogy

Less required tech = less debugging or "correcting"
+ more art, media, and fiction on the syllabus.

But (!!!) options afford space for technical work + media practice
while piquing interest in how fiction and culture are mediated.

Here's an example of the most technical options in the CMF book . . .

Image care of Danielle Morgan.

2. Content

2009-14: Pretty "meta," or methods and debates
(syllabus for "Mapping the Digital Humanities"; see Gold and Klein)

2015-20: Speculation, or future texts, design fictions, and prototypes
(syllabus for "Prototyping Pasts and Futures"; "Kits for Cultural History"; see Barchas, Nelson, and Sterling)

Recently: Like lit class, but fiction across media
(syllabus for "What's in a Game?"; see Anthropy and Hayles)

Image care of Danielle Morgan.

Content + Pedagogy

Starting with stories, and grounding media practice in fiction,
puts instructors and students on the same page,
but with attention to ambiguity and variety of experience.
We may go in different analytical directions from there.

Here's an example of content in the CMF book . . .

Image care of Danielle Morgan.

3. Frameworks

2009-17: Critical technical practice
(syllabus for "Minimal Computing"; see Agre)

2015-20: Conjectural criticism and fabulation
(syllabus for "Things to Think With"; see Kraus; Rosner)

Recently: Mediation as inquiry, or media aesthetics
(syllabus for "Prototyping Texts"; see W. Benjamin, Chuh, and Hansen)

Image care of Danielle Morgan.

Frames + Pedagogy

Attention to mediation, including how our experiences of fiction are
mediated and how fiction addresses us, helps students to
articulate "sense" (apprehension) with "making sense" (comprehension) and to evaluate the ways politics are aestheticized and aesthetics are
politicized across audio, images, and text.

Here's an example of the framework cooked up for the CMF book . . .

4. Engagement

2009-18: Log or sequence of short pieces documenting experiments
(syllabus for "Physical Computing and Fabrication";
see Chan on "Lit Bots")

2012-20: Portfolio culminating in a playable or working prototype
(syllabus for "Paper Computers"; see "DIY Video Games Inspired
by English Lit"
; "Wire in the Gallery")

Recently: Care and responsibility for practice
(syllabus for "Unlearning the Internet";
see Barad; R. Benjamin; Ọnụọha; Robinson; Wernimont)

Image care of Danielle Morgan.

Engagement + Pedagogy

Responsibility for practice shifts the question from novelty to
accountability, and even from reflection to how stories and
situations materialize (see Barad).

Engagement also becomes less about documenting a process
or producing a project and more about "making your own fun"
(see Riendeau), or addressing conventions and genres by stretching or
warping them. Students rely on their lived experiences as part of,
if not central to, their media practice. They make it theirs?

Clear assessment criteria, with options, is still key: a rubric that
applies to multiple prompts in the same module, for instance.

5. Access

2009-14: Course website with modules and links to OA materials

2015-20: Foreground and outline a procedure
(syllabus for "Readers Are Listening"; see Mateas)

Recently: OA textbook with an emphasis on accessibility
(see Hamraie; Mingus)

Image care of Danielle Morgan. Thanks as well to Faith Ryan for educating me on the topic of "access intimacy."

Thank You

Jentery Sayers | UVic English | Praxis Studio
@jenterysayers | jentery@uvic.ca

Slides at jentery.github.io/hartwick

With thanks again to Susan Navarette and everyone at Hartwick

Image care of Danielle Morgan

Resources

MLab Inventory (Spreadsheet)
"The Humanities Lab as a Makerspace" (Initiative)
"An Infrastructural Disposition" (Essay)
"Kits for Cultural History" (Video)
"Before You Make a Thing" (Resource)

Infrastructure supported by the CFI and
UVic Humanities, English, Visual Arts, Libraries,
and the Humanities Computing and Media Centre

This is the final slide in the deck.